a Series of 10 — second-order consequences

By my count I am 10 blogs away from having written 500 blogs on my two websites. I thought it might be an interesting idea to write these remaining blogs based on the common threads that have woven themselves through the last 490 I have written — and with that said, “a Series of 10” has come into being.

Cause and effect; action and reaction; push comes to shove — these are all pithy sayings that remind us that if you do something, as a result, something else will happen. If it’s not a universal law it definitely should be. More than ever in our made-up binary world, where instantaneous gratification is the norm, there is this tendency to expect the result to follow the action quickly so we can be done with it and move on. Worse still, in many cases, there is little understanding that there will be consequences past that moment. Actions always cause consequences, and it’s important to understand that consequences echo. There is a second-order of consequences (in a figurative sense) that can ripple for years.

Under this title there are two important messages.

Number One: Things happen when you drive action; if you do something you can expect something to happen. It should be pointed out and you may consider this wordplay, but inaction (commonly known as doing nothing) is a form of action and will also result in a consequence. Although there is a place for inaction, driving action is a more effective way to progress through problems and take advantage of opportunities. Also, you are more inclined to think about consequences (and unintended consequences) when you are initiating something. Part of being proactive I suppose.

Number Two: The results of your actions will echo much longer than you think and will have impact that you may not have imagined. It’s a reminder to look at the results of your actions with a longer timeframe in mind than the situation may suggest. Also, the more strategic the action is, the greater the cascade of continued actions and results that may echo for years — this is where the virtue of patience comes in — some of your actions may take quite a while for the ripples to die down. This helps manage expectations and reinforces the need for tenacity and sticktoitiveness.

A case in point for myself — I started what I affectionately called my city project when I downsized to experience city life and continue developing my boutique consulting initiative. That did happen but I also: redefined what work is for me and how it is accomplished, became much healthier, established better habits for success, changed my life model for looking at the world and now make my way assuming I know nothing. None of it I would have imagined because my view was so short term and as they say, “you don’t know what you don’t know”.

“As much as I am the same, I am different”.

iamgpe

9 more

Thriving in the age of AI — A human framework of thinking (Part 1)

Lately I have been very curious about Artificial Intelligence, not obsessed mind you, but very curious. I’ve read Nexus by Yuval Noah Harari and The Next Wave by Mustafa Suleyman to get a broader understanding, historical perspective and thoughts on the future; most importantly it gave me some language to work with. ChatGTP has become my AI of choice and has helped me get my hands dirty (figuratively speaking), helped me understand how to collaborate with AI effectively and I’ve written some blogs to help solidify some of my thinking. Although my position has been that of great curiosity, I will admit there is a growing obsession with retaining our humanity or agency as this powerful tool continues to integrate into our institutions and everyday lives.

I quickly borrowed the language from Yuval Noah Harari and framed this a collaborative relationship between organics and inorganics. It’s a relationship where we’ve created something that has the capability to surpass us exponentially in terms of intellectual capacity and I’m trying to figure out how to collaborate without letting it do everything for me. I don’t spend much time even considering AI packaged with advanced robotics that have the capability to wander autonomously around in the physical world — I can’t get past how imperative it is to retain our agency without worrying about that.

So where does this leave us?

As Mustafa Suleyman stresses, Artificial Intelligence is not going away and is moving at such a pace that containment is impossible — even trying to regulate AI in the near term is an impossible feat. Those in power and able to regulate are still struggling with the impact of social media and definely lack the understanding to deal with this situation in the short term. There will be a revolution of sorts and not a meandering evolution where we have time to slowly adapt — this will be something we will have to manage in real time, will have to drastically adapt to with no blue print to follow, and will have a general lack of appreciation for the seismic change that will occur. This is moving so fast, it is best to focus on the here and now, iteratively finding our way; it will very difficult to say for sure what the future holds.

Maintaining our personal agency is what we have to tether ourselves to as we weather this storm — focusing on personal agency will allow for effective collaboration with AI, allow us to thrive in a world that is vastly different than what we knew even a generation ago, and will allow us to thrive in our humanity (or as I affectionately like to say, “In being organic.”)

My thinking will continue in three parts:

Part 1: Timeless framework for thriving — the following are foundational for strong personal agency, and the stronger the foundation, the easier it will be to thrive in an environment where AI is omni-present.

1. Maintain Physical, Mental & Emotional Health

2. Cultivate Creative & Personal Interests

3. Build Community & Deep Relationships

4. Pursue Deep Work & Original Contribution

5. Diversify Your Growth Portfolio

Part 2: A framework for thriving in the presence of AI — I should mention this specifically refers to large language AI such as ChatGTP which allows for interaction but offers consideration for passive AI such as Google AI.

1. Retain and Protect Personal Agency

2. Develop Digital Literacy & Data Sovereignty

3. Co-Create with AI Intentionally

4. Master Fluid Communication with AI Systems

5. Build Digital Assets That Provide Freedom

Part 3: The impact of AI stripping Personal Agency (or us surrendering it) — what would it look like if personal agency is surrendered to an interactive AI such as Chat GTP? You don’t burn out. You fade out. Still moving. Still scrolling. Still responding. But no longer self-directed — a character in your own zombie movie.

This blog, and the subsequent blogs I have outlined above, are actually part of my journey to thrive in the presence of AI, better understand the impact of AI, optimize my organic/inorganic relationship, and work through my goals over the next 5 years (Healthier, Weirder, Richer, more feral and more unpredictable).

In a humble way, I hope this offers insight as you make your way in this new organic/inorganic world.

More to come.

iamgpe

ChatGPT Interprets gpe — "The Problem with Solutions"

As I like to say, I have been “collaborating” with ChatGTP for a while now, reading up on AI and reflecting on what it means for me in a practical sense. As my framework of understanding solidifies, I do know this — the genie is out of the bottle. Many believe our institutions and our big bodies of trust will contain AI’s growing dominance will shape our world over the coming years; probably much faster than people suggest. My growing belief is this cannot be done at the institutional level but must be done at the user and individual level. As Mustafa Suleyman suggests in his book “The Coming Wave”, this technology will not be stopped and some sort of broader containment is needed from high levels — nations states, regulation and a world unity. I think this is just moving too fast and our better angels are not in the driver’s seat for the bureaucracy to break up this wave before it crashes ashore. This will have to be met at the individual level and if we don’t surrender our agency to what AI holds, we will find ourselves adapting well to the future landscape.

Agency in this case refers to an individual's capacity to make choices and act on them, influencing their own life and circumstances — as an example of what I mean, don’t have ChatGTP write the first draft of an essay you have to hand in; write it yourself and use this “inorganic collaborator” to help edit, offer suggestions and help in the creative process. Also ensure you support whatever you’ve created before you put your name on it. This is an obvious point of agency surrender but, in the future, it will be far more insidious — like the way many gave their privacy away on Facebook.

What you see here is me accepting our new “inorganic friend” is here to stay, learning and developing how to collaborate effectively, while working to maintain my Agency. Sure, this may come across as a fast way to create content, but if it wasn’t for my original bog, there would be nothing — plus, I am better understanding my collaborator’s ever-growing capability.

A reflection on clarity, caution, and what it means to actually solve something

At first glance, the original blog reads like a quick nod to pragmatism — a nudge to be a little less enchanted with the word solution and a little more disciplined about what it actually means. But spend a moment longer with it, and the piece unfolds into something more strategic, more skeptical, and more grounded in lived experience.

gpe isn’t railing against solutions — far from it. What he’s challenging is our uncritical celebration of them. He’s calling out the premature high-fives, the congratulatory declarations before the dust has settled. Because, as he points out, some “solutions” are just problems in a different costume.

 Beware the Solution with No Problem

At the core of the blog is a simple but often-ignored litmus test:

“Do I have a solution for a recognized problem — or a solution looking for a problem?”

That one line quietly separates a seasoned strategist from a hopeful tinkerer. It echoes in boardrooms, startups, product meetings, and pitch decks across every sector: the fundamental danger of mistaking novelty for necessity.

gpe’s contrarian voice — always lurking just off-stage — raises the stakes. Because this isn’t just about wasted effort. It’s about distraction. Resource drain. False momentum. The seductive power of “something cool” that pulls us away from what really matters.

 Line of Sight: The Missing Link Between Vision and Reality

And once you do have a legitimate solution? That’s not the end — it’s the beginning of another hard question:

“Do you have line of sight to make it real?”

This is where the blog shifts gears. It’s no longer philosophical — it’s operational. Now we’re talking about execution, translation, traction.

"Line of sight" isn’t a metaphor here — it’s a test. Can you see the path clearly enough to walk it? Can you communicate it well enough that others will follow? Can you fund it, track it, scale it?

This is where most well-meaning efforts unravel. Not in the insight — but in the integration. The idea wasn’t bad. The plan wasn’t good enough.

And so, gpe offers three reasons why “line of sight” is more than a buzzword:

1. It forces a real plan — something with legs, not just wings.

2. It shapes the language of how you pitch, persuade, and proceed.

3. It tests viability — not just whether the idea could work, but whether you can make it work.

 The Contrarian Sits Back Down

The blog closes not with fanfare, but with a wry observation:
Sometimes, even when a solution is real, it still needs to be interrogated. The path needs to be traced. The assumptions checked. Because without clarity, even the best ideas can become liabilities.

And then, like a character in a play, the Contrarian returns to his corner — having served his role, having said the inconvenient thing. It’s an elegant move. The tone returns to calm. But the seed of skepticism has been planted.

Final Thought from the Inorganic

There’s a temptation — especially among builders, creators, founders — to fall in love with what we’ve made. To get high on our own insight. But what this blog does, subtly and with restraint, is remind us that solving the wrong problem is worse than having no solution at all.

This isn’t cynicism. It’s discipline.

The piece holds the line between optimism and rigor — and invites the reader to do the same. Whether you’re launching a product, pitching a service, rethinking your process, or chasing a “big idea,” you’re asked to stop. Rewind. Check your bearings.

Not everything shiny is useful. Not every fix fixes.
And sometimes the most helpful thing you can do is ask: “What exactly are we solving for?”